• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Blog

Logo 1 Created with Sketch.

  • About
  • Our Lawyers
    • Andrew Wray
    • Juan Echavarria
    • Salman Rana
  • Expertise
    • Employment Law
    • Civil Litigation
  • Blog
  • COVID-19 Resources
  • Contact Us
  • Book a Consultation
termination-employment-law-Wray-Legal.

Am I entitled to termination pay if I am fired for cause?

July 22, 2022 Tags: Constructive Dismissal, Employment Law, termination notice

Am I entitled to termination pay if I am fired for cause?

A recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal, Render v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator (Canada) Limited, 2022 ONCA 310, confirmed that where an employee is terminated on a “for cause” basis, meaning the employee is not entitled to receive reasonable notice in accordance with the common law, the employer may nonetheless be required to pay the employee his or her entitlements under the minimum standards set out in the Employment Standards Act (the “ESA”). According to the Court in Render, this will be the case where the conduct giving rise to the termination of employment “for cause” does not meet the standard of “wilful misconduct” set out in the ESA, required to disentitle an employee to notice of termination.

The Court’s finding in Render follows the same reasoning outlined by the Court of Appeal in previous decisions, such as Waksdale v. Swegon North America Inc., which held that “wilful misconduct” is a higher threshold to meet than the common law “for cause” standard.

termination-employment-law-Wray-Legal.

Historically, employers in Ontario have had the option of terminating an employee’s employment in one two ways: (i) “with notice”, at any time, upon providing reasonable notice of termination or notice under the terms stipulated in the employment contract, with the later required to be equal or greater than the ESA minimum notice requirements; or (ii) “without notice”, meaning without notice or pay in lieu thereof, where the employer establishes that the employee has engaged in conduct which renders the continuation of the employment relationship untenable. The latter has generally been referred to as ”for cause” termination. The Court’s decision in Render determined that an employee, although properly terminated “for cause”, will be entitled to ESA notice of termination or pay in lieu thereof, where the conduct does not amount to “wilful misconduct”.

Accordingly, in light of the Court’s decision in Waksdale, and further clarification by the Render case, an employer may terminate an employee’s job (i) without cause, meaning with notice as outlined above; (ii) “for cause” meaning without providing reasonable notice in accordance with the common law, but still providing the employee with the minimum ESA termination pay, where the conduct does not amount to “wilful misconduct”; and (iii) for “wilful misconduct”, meaning the employee would not be entitled to termination pay under the common law or the ESA.

The Court in Render further clarified that, for misconduct to meet the standard of “wilful misconduct” threshold, the employee must do something deliberately, meaning on purpose, knowing that it was wrong. To arrive at this conclusion, the Court in Render relied on previous case law which held that inadvertent conduct, regardless of how serious, careless or thoughtless, does not amount to “wilful misconduct”. In the Render case, the Court found that, although the employee’s conduct allowed the employer to dismiss the employee “for cause”, it did not raise to the level of “wilful misconduct” because the conduct was not found to have been preplanned.

The Court’s decision in Render highlights that employers will only be able to terminate an employee without notice under the ESA in very limited circumstances, being where an employee not only engages in severe misconduct, but does so purposefully. Similarly, the Court’s decision seems to indicate that the misconduct must also be preplanned, and actions taken in the “heat of the moment” will not suffice.

As lawyers with expertise in employment law, we often advise employees on their rights upon termination and assist with the negotiation of separation/termination packages. Similarly, we advise employers regarding potential liabilities associated with the decision to dismiss an employee, in accordance with the relevant legislation, the employment contract, and the most recent case law.

Employers and employees may contact us at any time regarding their questions and needs.

 

 

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Career Opportunity at Wray Legal
  • Am I entitled to termination pay if I am fired for cause?
  • Should Companies update their Employment Contracts?
  • Non-competition Agreements Restricted under the Employment Standards Act
  • Termination during COVID can result in longer notice periods

Tags

#EmploymentLaw Blog Civil Litigation Constructive Dismissal Covid Employment Law Covid Mental Health Covid Wrongful Termination Employment Employment Law Health and Safety Human Rights Juan Echavarria Just Cause Termination Limitation Period Long-Term Disability Benefits LTD Benefits LTD Insurance Benefits Mechanical Business News Resignation Sale of Business Severance Pay Stock Options termination notice Total Disability wrongful dismissal

Footer

Contact Us

181 University Avenue, Suite 2200 Toronto, Ontario Canada M5H 3M7

T 416-642-0460
F 416-363-7875

Contact Page LinkedIn
Book a Consultation






    Please note that contact through our website is for informational purpose only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship.

    * Required

    Reviews

    • I had the pleasure of working with Andrew & his team and I could not be more thankful for having them represent me during a very trying time. They were very knowledgeable and helped guide me thru the entire process. Going thru any legal issue can be very emotionally draining but knowing I had Andrew on my side def helped ease my anxiety. In the end, Andrew was able to win my dispute and I owe it all to his attention to detail and wealth of knowledge.

      Charlene De Silva

    • Robert Tarantino and his associates at Wray Legal handled my case against my former employer with compassion, ethically sound expert advice in plain language and professional courtesy during my termination process, a stressful event in any working person's life. I was presented with all potential courses of action during my initial meeting prior to making a decision to retain services, and was treated with respect and dignity every step of the way. Wray Legal was able to mediate an acceptable settlement without having to proceed with a formal human rights violation compliant at the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal. Thank you Robert, Andrew and Samantha.

      Ian G.

    • We contracted with Robert Tarantino of Wray Legal to do a respectful workplaces presentation to our organization. This was part of a follow up to a StressAssess.ca survey we had done with all of our staff. Robert’s presentation included: Introduction; Overview – Why ‘Respectful Workplaces’ is an Important Topic; What is a Respectful Workplace?; Occupational Health and Safety Act – workplace harassment; Human Rights Code – discrimination in employment; Fostering a Healthy and Respectful Workplace; and Q & A – Discussion. The presentation was extremely well done, very engaging and included excellent examples. Robert did an excellent job and I would highly recommend his services.

      Michael Roche

      CEO, Occupational Health Clinics for Ontario Workers

    • I am grateful to have worked with Andrew Wray on a Third Party Claim that was filed against me. While we arrived at a very amicable conclusion, it was a rather complex route to get there. Andrew was extremely patient with both me and the other party. His legal advice was insightful and he always acted in an extremely professional manner. I asked a lot of questions regarding law and process and Andrew always took the time to ensure that I was comfortable with both. I really had the feeling that he was actually working for me and looking out for my best interests. I would have no reservations about contacting Andrew again for help, nor would I have any reservations in recommending him to a friend or colleague. Many thanks!!

      KM

    • Andrew Wray helped me settle a dispute with my past employer which lead to a healthy settlement. I would recommend Andrew to anyone looking for a professional and cost-effective litigator.

      A Google User

    • Andrew Wray came highly recommended and now I know why! Andrew took a personal and very supportive approach as he helped to guide me through a long and challenging labour hearing process that had already cost me too many sleepless nights. His demonstrated understanding of the complex legal and procedural issues gave me a tremendous confidence. Having never previously testified or given evidence, his advice on what I could expect on the stand was worth its weight in gold. I was kepy completely in the loop with regard to strategies and next steps, and was always made to feel like I was steering the ship - with Andrew as my formidable engine. Oh, and by the way, we won the case! :)

      Jamie S.

    © 2023 Wray Legal
    Site by Cameron Duncalfe
    Privacy Policy