• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Blog

Logo 1 Created with Sketch.

  • About
  • Our Lawyers
    • Andrew Wray
    • Juan Echavarria
    • Salman Rana
  • Expertise
    • Employment Law
    • Civil Litigation
  • Blog
  • COVID-19 Resources
  • Contact Us
  • Book a Consultation
severance-pay-law-Wray-Legal-employment-lawyers

Am I entitled to Severance Pay? Update to law of Severance

December 2, 2021 Tags: Severance Pay

When an employer terminates an employee’s job without cause, it will generally be required to either provide notice or termination pay in lieu of notice. Depending on the length of employment and the size of the employer, the employee may also be entitled to severance pay.

In accordance with section 64 of the Employment Standards Act (the “ESA”), employees are entitled to severance pay if they have been employed for at least 5 years, and they are one of 50 or more employees to have been terminated over a six-month period, or the employer has a payroll of $2.5 million or more.

Whether employers have the requisite level of payroll to be required to pay severance pay to its employees was historically assessed with regard to the employer’s Ontario payroll only, even where the employer operated on a national or international capacity.

The Divisional Court, on appeal from a decision of the Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB), in Hawkes v. Max Aicher (North America) Limited (Hawkes), recently held that when calculating an employers’ payroll, for the purpose of determining employee’s entitlement to severance pay, the global payroll of the employer must be taken into account.

This overturned the previous decision of the OLRB in Hawkes.

Section 64(2) of the Employment Standards Act (ESA)indicates how payroll is to be calculated to determine if an employer meets the $2.5 million threshold to be required to pay severance to certain employees upon termination of their employment. Although s. 64(2) does not itself restrict the calculation of the employer’s payroll to its operations in Ontario, the OLRB held in Hawkes, that when read in conjunction with s. 3(1) of the ESA, s.64(2) is restricted to an employer’s payroll in Ontario.

Section 3(1) of the ESA reads as follows:

To whom Act applies

3 (1) Subject to subsections (2) to (5), the employment standards set out in this Act apply with respect to an employee and his or her employer if,

(a) the employee’s work is to be performed in Ontario; or

(b) the employee’s work is to be performed in Ontario and outside Ontario but the work performed outside Ontario is a continuation of work performed in Ontario.  2000, c. 41, s. 3 (1).

The OLRB held that, since the legislature limited the applicability of the employment standards in the ESA, to employees whose work was performed in Ontario or whose work is a continuation of work performed in Ontario, there must also be an intention to limit the payroll calculation to payroll in Ontario, for the purpose of severance. However, the Divisional Court overturned this finding, and held instead that, when interpreting a statute, the inclusion of words of limitation in one part of the act and not in another, such as the inclusion of the words “in Ontario”, is seen as deliberate and meaningful.

The Divisional Court further held that there is no jurisdictional hurdle for the Province of Ontario to legislate that an assessment of an employer’s ability to pay severance should consider the overall size of the employer, not just its size in Ontario.

Accordingly, the Divisional Court allowed the applicant’s appeal in Hawkes and remitted the matter back to the OLRB for a determination of all remaining issues, directing that the OLRB must take into account that the calculation of payroll, for the purpose of severance, is not limited to Ontario or Canadian payroll.

The field of employment law is constantly evolving. It is important to consult an employment lawyer to help determine your rights upon termination. As lawyers with expertise in this area, we advise our clients often on their entitlements under the ESA and at common law, taking into account the most up to date state of the law.

You may contact us at any time for assistance.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Am I entitled to termination pay if I am fired for cause?
  • Should Companies update their Employment Contracts?
  • Non-competition Agreements Restricted under the Employment Standards Act
  • Termination during COVID can result in longer notice periods
  • Am I entitled to Severance Pay? Update to law of Severance

Tags

Blog Civil Litigation Constructive Dismissal Covid Employment Law Covid Mental Health Covid Wrongful Termination Employment Employment Law Health and Safety Human Rights Juan Echavarria Just Cause Termination Limitation Period Long-Term Disability Benefits LTD Benefits LTD Insurance Benefits Mechanical Business News Resignation Sale of Business Severance Pay Stock Options termination notice Total Disability wrongful dismissal

Footer

Contact Us

181 University Avenue, Suite 2200 Toronto, Ontario Canada M5H 3M7

T 416-642-0460
F 416-363-7875

Contact Page LinkedIn
Book a Consultation






    Please note that contact through our website is for informational purpose only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship.

    * Required

    Reviews

    • I had the pleasure of working with Andrew & his team and I could not be more thankful for having them represent me during a very trying time. They were very knowledgeable and helped guide me thru the entire process. Going thru any legal issue can be very emotionally draining but knowing I had Andrew on my side def helped ease my anxiety. In the end, Andrew was able to win my dispute and I owe it all to his attention to detail and wealth of knowledge.

      Charlene De Silva

    • Robert Tarantino and his associates at Wray Legal handled my case against my former employer with compassion, ethically sound expert advice in plain language and professional courtesy during my termination process, a stressful event in any working person's life. I was presented with all potential courses of action during my initial meeting prior to making a decision to retain services, and was treated with respect and dignity every step of the way. Wray Legal was able to mediate an acceptable settlement without having to proceed with a formal human rights violation compliant at the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal. Thank you Robert, Andrew and Samantha.

      Ian G.

    • We contracted with Robert Tarantino of Wray Legal to do a respectful workplaces presentation to our organization. This was part of a follow up to a StressAssess.ca survey we had done with all of our staff. Robert’s presentation included: Introduction; Overview – Why ‘Respectful Workplaces’ is an Important Topic; What is a Respectful Workplace?; Occupational Health and Safety Act – workplace harassment; Human Rights Code – discrimination in employment; Fostering a Healthy and Respectful Workplace; and Q & A – Discussion. The presentation was extremely well done, very engaging and included excellent examples. Robert did an excellent job and I would highly recommend his services.

      Michael Roche

      CEO, Occupational Health Clinics for Ontario Workers

    • I am grateful to have worked with Andrew Wray on a Third Party Claim that was filed against me. While we arrived at a very amicable conclusion, it was a rather complex route to get there. Andrew was extremely patient with both me and the other party. His legal advice was insightful and he always acted in an extremely professional manner. I asked a lot of questions regarding law and process and Andrew always took the time to ensure that I was comfortable with both. I really had the feeling that he was actually working for me and looking out for my best interests. I would have no reservations about contacting Andrew again for help, nor would I have any reservations in recommending him to a friend or colleague. Many thanks!!

      KM

    • Andrew Wray helped me settle a dispute with my past employer which lead to a healthy settlement. I would recommend Andrew to anyone looking for a professional and cost-effective litigator.

      A Google User

    • Andrew Wray came highly recommended and now I know why! Andrew took a personal and very supportive approach as he helped to guide me through a long and challenging labour hearing process that had already cost me too many sleepless nights. His demonstrated understanding of the complex legal and procedural issues gave me a tremendous confidence. Having never previously testified or given evidence, his advice on what I could expect on the stand was worth its weight in gold. I was kepy completely in the loop with regard to strategies and next steps, and was always made to feel like I was steering the ship - with Andrew as my formidable engine. Oh, and by the way, we won the case! :)

      Jamie S.

    © 2023 Wray Legal
    Site by Cameron Duncalfe
    Privacy Policy