• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Blog

Logo 1 Created with Sketch.

  • About
  • Our Lawyers
    • Andrew Wray
    • Juan Echavarria
    • Salman Rana
  • Expertise
    • Employment Law
    • Civil Litigation
    • COVID-19 Resources
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Book a Consultation
Employment-Law-Termination-Wray-Legal

Employment Bonus After Termination

March 1, 2021 Tags: Covid Employment Law, Employment Law

Are employees entitled to bonuses after the employment relationship is terminated?

Upon the termination of employment without cause, being by no fault of the employee, the employee will generally be entitled to reasonable notice of termination or pay in lieu thereof, under the common law, or at the very least, to the minimum standards set out in the Employment Standards Act (the “Act”). Whether the common law standard or the Act apply will depend on the employment agreement, if there is one, and if so, on whether it is enforceable. Once the appropriate period of notice is determined, the law requires that the employer provide the employee with his or her full compensation for the notice period, which may include salary, benefits, and bonuses. Where an employee is entitled to a bonus as part of the regular compensation, the employer may have to pay such bonuses that the employee would have been paid or earned during the notice period.

The employee’s entitlement to a bonus payment during the notice period will largely depend on whether the bonus is an integral part of the employee’s compensation, and if so, on whether the employment agreement contains a valid and enforceable clause that prevents the employee from requesting a bonus payment after termination.

To determine if the bonus constitutes an integral part of the employee compensation, the Court will consider various factors such as whether the bonus was discretionary, based on performance or any other metric, or if the employee was entitled to the bonus by reason of his or her continued employment and the payment was based on a pre established formula. For example, where an employee is entitled to a non-discretionary annual bonus of 20% of the employee’s salary, which is in fact paid annually, the Court is likely to find that it constitutes an integral part of the compensation, and thus should be paid through the notice period, both where payable or accrued, absent an enforceable agreement to the contrary. On the other hand, where the employee’s agreement stipulates that he or she may receive a performance-based bonus, at the employer’s full discretion, it is unlikely to be considered as an integral part of the compensation.

In order to avoid paying employee bonuses throughout the notice period, employers often include language in the employment agreement that require employees to be “actively employed” or a “full-time employee” to be entitled to the bonus. The Ontario Court of Appeal found in Paquette v. TeraGo Networks that such provisions, on their own, are unenforceable. This is so because damages for wrongful dismissal arise as a result of a breach of the employment contract, and when awarded, require the employer to put the employee in the same position it would have been but for that breach, meaning, what the employee would have earned during the notice period if given proper notice. The Court in Paquette found that the employer could not rely solely in a provision requiring the employee to be “actively employed” to withhold a bonus payment, given that the employee was only unable to be “actively employed” due to the employer’s failure to provide proper notice.

In an additional decision regarding employee bonuses upon termination, the Ontario Court of Appeal, in Andros v. Colliers Macaulay Nichols Inc., held further that where the bonus is deemed to be an integral part of the employee’s compensation package, the employee will be owed both, the bonus earned while employed which became payable during the notice period, and, if any, the bonus which would have been earned during the notice period that would become payable even after the notice period has expired.

The Court in Paquette and Andros held that, where the employer wishes to limit the employee’s entitlement to a bonus through the notice period, it must draft a clear and unambiguous clause that restricts the employee’s rights under the common law. Where the Court finds that no such clause exists, or it was poorly drafted, the employer will not be able to rely on it to withhold bonus payments that become payable, or would have been earned, during the notice period.

As lawyers with broad expertise in employment law, we often advise our clients with regard to the appropriate compensation package they are entitled to based on the common law, the ESA, and their employment contract. You may contact us at any time with your employment law questions.

 

 

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Does My Original Contract Still Apply After 15 Years of Employment?
  • Mass Layoffs: Know the Law, Know your Rights
  • Severance pay in Ontario: What if I am fired for cause?
  • Should Companies update their Employment Contracts?
  • Non-competition Agreements Restricted under the Employment Standards Act

Tags

Blog Civil Litigation Constructive Dismissal Covid Employment Law Covid Mental Health Covid Wrongful Termination Employment Employment Contract Employment Law Health and Safety Human Rights Juan Echavarria Just Cause Termination Limitation Period Long-Term Disability Benefits LTD Benefits LTD Insurance Benefits Mechanical Business News Resignation Sale of Business Severance Pay Stock Options Termination Law termination notice Termination rights Total Disability wrongful dismissal

Footer

Contact Us

181 University Avenue, Suite 2200 Toronto, Ontario Canada M5H 3M7

T 416-642-0460
F 416-363-7875

Contact Page LinkedIn
Book a Consultation





    Please note that contact through our website is for informational purpose only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship.

    * Required

    [anr_nocaptcha g-recaptcha-response]

    Reviews

    Clecia Louzado
    Clecia Louzado
    2021-05-10
    Andrew is very professional, knowledgeable, fair and straightforward. I was grateful for his ability to outline all my options clearly and also his professionalism during a difficult time in his personal life. He did not let his personal life affect any time sensitive needs of my case, which didn’t go unnoticed. Highly recommend Andrew!
    Anton Koschany
    Anton Koschany
    2021-02-21
    Andrew Wray provided thorough analysis of my circumstances and provided sound advice. He is personable, knowledgeable and took the stress out of a stressful situation. In my professional career I have had occasion to work with many lawyers and I can easily say that Andrew meets and exceeds the bar (pardon the pun). Anton K.
    Lamrana Bah
    Lamrana Bah
    2021-02-02
    I had a very positive experience with the staff at Wray Legal LLP. Andrew Wray is a very brilliant bilingual lawyer. I was in search of a French Speaking lawyer and I came across him. He is a good listener, very professional with patience and passion for his job. I am grateful I met you. Thanks to you and your staff for your exceptional services 🙂
    Jamie Saunders
    Jamie Saunders
    2021-01-21
    Andrew Wray came highly recommended and now I know why! Andrew took a personal and very supportive approach as he helped to guide me through a long and challenging labour hearing process that had already cost me too many sleepless nights. His demonstrated understanding of the complex legal and procedural issues gave me tremendous confidence. Having never previously testified or given evidence, his advice on what I could expect on the stand was worth its weight in gold. I was kept completely in the loop with regard to strategies and next steps, and was always made to feel like I was steering the ship - with Andrew as my formidable engine. Oh, and by the way, we won the case! 🙂
    Mark Cuff
    Mark Cuff
    2020-12-19
    I am also highly recommending Wray Legal. Andrew represented me in a complicated employment matter - he was extremely responsive, and knowledgable in offering excellent legal advice. Andrew explained/outlined thoroughly what to expect and worked to make sure I was getting the very best outcome. I really liked how very realistic he was about my options and which would be the most beneficial to my specific situation. Wray Legal came highly recommended from friends and I can see why. Excellent experience
    Jennifer Morrison
    Jennifer Morrison
    2020-12-18
    Andrew and his team were there for me at a very difficult time. Andrew is always kind and compassionate, while understanding the job that needs to be done. I was very pleased with the outcome of my case. When it comes to a legal team, you want the best in your corner and Andrew is the best! I would highly recommend calling Andrew to see how his team can get the best settlement for you, I’m glad I did!
    Richard Goodman
    Richard Goodman
    2020-12-18
    Andrew helped me to resolve a complicated legal dispute with a former employer. Andrew was extremely professional is all of his dealings with me and opposing counsel. Andrew treated me as a partner, not just a client. It was an extremely positive experience and outcome, especially considering the difficult nature of the dispute. Thanks for all your help, Andrew!
    Tamara Roitman
    Tamara Roitman
    2020-12-11
    Andrew represented me through a workplace issue during a very low point in my life. From a legal standpoint he was extremely knowledgeable and professional. More than that, however, he was kind, gentle and understanding.  Having a lawyer that not only knew what he was doing, but who is also a good human being who went above and beyond to communicate and offer emotional support was the best possible thing both for the outcome of my case as well as for my mental health. I will always feel grateful to Andrew and his firm.
    © 2023 Wray Legal