• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Blog

Logo 1 Created with Sketch.

  • About
  • Our Lawyers
    • Andrew Wray
    • Juan Echavarria
    • Salman Rana
  • Expertise
    • Employment Law
    • Civil Litigation
  • Blog
  • COVID-19 Resources
  • Contact Us
  • Book a Consultation
Covid Employment Law termination Wrongful Dismissal

What Is The Duty To Mitigate During The Covid Pandemic?

October 28, 2020 Tags: Covid Employment Law, Employment Law

What is the duty to mitigate and am I obliged to mitigate during the COVID-19 pandemic?

In Ontario, entitlements upon termination arise from two sources: The Employment Standards Act (ESA), which lays out the minimum standards in employment relationships, and the common law. Over time, the law has developed such that, if you agree to be bound by the minimum entitlements in your employment contract, you may only receive those minimum entitlements if terminated.

However, if your employment contract did not set out your minimum entitlements then the common law governs, and you may be entitled to more than the minimum standards set out in the ESA. The law is strict when it comes to scrutinizing employment contracts to determine if you are only entitled to the legislative minimum standards. If the minimum standards are set out in your contract, they dictate your entitlements; if not, the common law analysis of reasonable notice is applied.

An interesting consideration comes into play when mitigation is addressed. Under the ESA, an employee is entitled at law to termination pay, and if qualifying, severance pay, the latter without any obligation on the employee. These are the entitlements at law and they cannot be contracted out of or denied through a post-termination act of the employee. This means that a terminated employee is entitled to a full payment of all statutory monies owed even if they immediately find new employment or take no steps to find alternate employment.

At common law, mitigation comes into play. It is important to note that an employee is never required at law to mitigate. A judicial determination of the reasonable notice period you are entitled to at common law does not include a consideration of mitigation. However, in practice, mitigation plays an important role in the amount of damages the court will award in response to the determination of the notice period, which may be reduced upon a finding that there was a failure to mitigate. Where an employee fails to mitigate the consequences can be severe, even if the employee has a good prima facie case. In this regard, the duty to mitigate is sometimes considered a duty that you owe to yourself, in that it preserves your entitlements to monies awarded by the Court. If you properly mitigate, the Courts may award damages for the total of the notice period that has been determined; if you do not mitigate, the court may award damages for less than the total notice period.

Given that mitigation is beneficial, what does it mean? Mitigation in the termination of employment context means that the terminated individual has to make reasonable efforts to secure new employment. This means taking such steps as updating your resume, applying for postings, reaching out to contacts in the industry, or meeting with a career counselor. Mitigation is an individualized process and your circumstances such as age, seniority and type of employment are considered when evaluating your efforts, as are external factors such as the job climate and competitiveness of industry. It may mean accepting a new position that, based on these factors, seems reasonable.

While the employee is the person performing the mitigating tasks, if the employer chooses to argue failure to mitigate then the employer bears the burden of proving such failure. Here, the standard is reasonableness. If the employer is successful, then the adjudicating official may reduce the employee’s damages in an amount that correlates to what they could have earned if successful in their efforts, or eliminate damages entirely. The analysis into efforts to mitigate is evidence based, so keeping track of your job hunt is crucial.

It is worth noting that the COVID-19 pandemic is expected to have an effect in how courts will decide whether you have met your duty to mitigate. While there is yet to be a judicial determination, it is reasonable to expect that the courts will recognize that there should be a significantly lower expectation that you, despite reasonable efforts, will be able to secure new employment in the context of the pandemic. It remains to be seen if, given the mass layoffs and business closures caused by COVID-19, courts will lengthen notice periods to compensate for a job climate that is expected to have very negative effects on any mitigation efforts you may make.

Mitigation is not a clear-cut process, but rather a contextual analysis of a variety of factors and circumstances. It is helpful to contact an experienced employment lawyer to discuss one’s duties to mitigate to ensure that you retain your full entitlements at common law. Learn More.

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Am I entitled to termination pay if I am fired for cause?
  • Should Companies update their Employment Contracts?
  • Non-competition Agreements Restricted under the Employment Standards Act
  • Termination during COVID can result in longer notice periods
  • Am I entitled to Severance Pay? Update to law of Severance

Tags

Blog Civil Litigation Constructive Dismissal Covid Employment Law Covid Mental Health Covid Wrongful Termination Employment Employment Law Health and Safety Human Rights Juan Echavarria Just Cause Termination Limitation Period Long-Term Disability Benefits LTD Benefits LTD Insurance Benefits Mechanical Business News Resignation Sale of Business Severance Pay Stock Options termination notice Total Disability wrongful dismissal

Footer

Contact Us

181 University Avenue, Suite 2200 Toronto, Ontario Canada M5H 3M7

T 416-642-0460
F 416-363-7875

Contact Page LinkedIn
Book a Consultation






    Please note that contact through our website is for informational purpose only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship.

    * Required

    Reviews

    • I had the pleasure of working with Andrew & his team and I could not be more thankful for having them represent me during a very trying time. They were very knowledgeable and helped guide me thru the entire process. Going thru any legal issue can be very emotionally draining but knowing I had Andrew on my side def helped ease my anxiety. In the end, Andrew was able to win my dispute and I owe it all to his attention to detail and wealth of knowledge.

      Charlene De Silva

    • Robert Tarantino and his associates at Wray Legal handled my case against my former employer with compassion, ethically sound expert advice in plain language and professional courtesy during my termination process, a stressful event in any working person's life. I was presented with all potential courses of action during my initial meeting prior to making a decision to retain services, and was treated with respect and dignity every step of the way. Wray Legal was able to mediate an acceptable settlement without having to proceed with a formal human rights violation compliant at the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal. Thank you Robert, Andrew and Samantha.

      Ian G.

    • We contracted with Robert Tarantino of Wray Legal to do a respectful workplaces presentation to our organization. This was part of a follow up to a StressAssess.ca survey we had done with all of our staff. Robert’s presentation included: Introduction; Overview – Why ‘Respectful Workplaces’ is an Important Topic; What is a Respectful Workplace?; Occupational Health and Safety Act – workplace harassment; Human Rights Code – discrimination in employment; Fostering a Healthy and Respectful Workplace; and Q & A – Discussion. The presentation was extremely well done, very engaging and included excellent examples. Robert did an excellent job and I would highly recommend his services.

      Michael Roche

      CEO, Occupational Health Clinics for Ontario Workers

    • I am grateful to have worked with Andrew Wray on a Third Party Claim that was filed against me. While we arrived at a very amicable conclusion, it was a rather complex route to get there. Andrew was extremely patient with both me and the other party. His legal advice was insightful and he always acted in an extremely professional manner. I asked a lot of questions regarding law and process and Andrew always took the time to ensure that I was comfortable with both. I really had the feeling that he was actually working for me and looking out for my best interests. I would have no reservations about contacting Andrew again for help, nor would I have any reservations in recommending him to a friend or colleague. Many thanks!!

      KM

    • Andrew Wray helped me settle a dispute with my past employer which lead to a healthy settlement. I would recommend Andrew to anyone looking for a professional and cost-effective litigator.

      A Google User

    • Andrew Wray came highly recommended and now I know why! Andrew took a personal and very supportive approach as he helped to guide me through a long and challenging labour hearing process that had already cost me too many sleepless nights. His demonstrated understanding of the complex legal and procedural issues gave me a tremendous confidence. Having never previously testified or given evidence, his advice on what I could expect on the stand was worth its weight in gold. I was kepy completely in the loop with regard to strategies and next steps, and was always made to feel like I was steering the ship - with Andrew as my formidable engine. Oh, and by the way, we won the case! :)

      Jamie S.

    © 2023 Wray Legal
    Site by Cameron Duncalfe
    Privacy Policy