• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Blog

Logo 1 Created with Sketch.

  • About
  • Our Lawyers
    • Andrew Wray
    • Juan Echavarria
    • Salman Rana
  • Expertise
    • Employment Law
    • Civil Litigation
  • Blog
  • COVID-19 Resources
  • Contact Us
  • Book a Consultation
Stock-options-after-termination-employment-law

What Happens to my Stock Options if I am Terminated?

February 7, 2020 Tags: Blog, Employment, Stock Options

Over the past few decades the Courts in Ontario have developed a significant amount of jurisprudence regarding an employee’s entitlements to various forms of compensation upon termination, including health benefits, commissions, bonuses, and pension plans. It is well established in the law that an employee is entitled to their total compensation for the duration of the reasonable notice period subject to any contractual limitations.

Most recently in December 2019, the Ontario Court of Appeal in O’Reilly v. IMAX Corporation, 2019 ONCA 991 addressed the question of a dismissed employee’s right to exercise stock options during the notice period, or receive damages in lieu of the lost opportunity to do so.

O’Reilly had been an employee of IMAX Corporation for 22 years, most recently as President, when he was terminated without cause. His compensation included a base salary, commission, health benefits and both a long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”), composed of restricted share units and stock options, and an additional stock option plan. The parties disagreed over whether O’Reilly’s stock options and restricted share units continued to vest after the date he was dismissed based on whether the language of the LTIP limited O’Reilly’s rights on termination.

At a summary judgment motion, O’Reilly was awarded damages for wrongful dismissal calculated on a reasonable notice period of 24 months, along with damages for lost opportunity to earn commission, pension contributions and the value of health benefits during the reasonable notice period. Further, and the subject of the appeal, the motions judge awarded O’Reilly damages for the lost opportunity to exercise the LTIP and stock option awards.

On appeal, the Court of Appeal began with the general principle that O’Reilly had a common law entitlement to full compensation for all losses arising from the wrongful dismissal, the wrongfulness being the dismissal without reasonable notice. The Court of Appeal then explained the second portion of the test: whether the terms of a contract altered or removed that common law right. In determining whether the right is altered or removed, the Court reiterated that any such language must do so unambiguously. As such, absent clear and unequivocal language that the contract removed the common law right, in this case to exercise one’s stock options, the common law right to compensation prevails.

In reviewing the contract between O’Reilly and IMAX Corporation, which stated that the restricted share units and stock options are cancelled immediately when employment “terminates for any reason,” the Court held that “terminates for any reason” cannot include termination without cause. The reason being that the termination contemplated must mean termination according to law and held that the agreement should not be presumed to have provided for an unlawful triggering event such as a wrongful dismissal. The Court of Appeal upheld the motion judge’s reasoning that this language was not a “clear, express provision that removed the common law right.”

Finding that the wrongful dismissal did not cancel O’Reilly’s rights to the restricted share units and stock options, the Court of Appeal confirmed O’Reilly was entitled to damages for the loss of his entitlement to exercise those rights as the awards continued to vest during the notice period.

Quantifying Damages for Loss Opportunity to Exercise Stock Options

Having clarified that a dismissed employee is entitled to compensation for the lost opportunity to exercise stock options during the reasonable notice period subject to any valid contractual limitations, the next question is how one determines the value of the loss.  This was at issue on cross-appeal in O’Reilly and the Court of Appeal approved of the motion judge’s method.

In supplementary reasons at O’Reilly v. Imax Corporation, 2019 ONSC 1239, the motions judge confirmed that “the quantification of such loss [to exercise stock options] is to be made on the basis of what would have probably happened had the Plaintiff been employed until the end of the notice period.” (para. 2)  The motions judge received submissions on this question from both parties. The judge decided that the approach to adopt is to consider the Plaintiff’s actual sales activities during the reasonable notice period and determined the case upon reviewing evidence of the Plaintiff’s account statements in this regard.

Take Away

Especially for executives, the question of compensation plans becomes very relevant at both the outset of the employment relationship and upon termination. The O’Reilly case confirms the general right to all forms of compensation and benefits upon termination including the right to exercise stock options that vest during the reasonable notice period or damages in lieu subject to any valid contractual limitations.

At Wray Legal LLP, we regularly assist executives and other employees at both the contract negotiation stage and upon termination to obtain the best contract possible going into employment and to protect their rights upon termination.  Please contact one of our experienced employment lawyers to discuss your unique situation.

 

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Career Opportunity at Wray Legal
  • Am I entitled to termination pay if I am fired for cause?
  • Should Companies update their Employment Contracts?
  • Non-competition Agreements Restricted under the Employment Standards Act
  • Termination during COVID can result in longer notice periods

Tags

#EmploymentLaw Blog Civil Litigation Constructive Dismissal Covid Employment Law Covid Mental Health Covid Wrongful Termination Employment Employment Law Health and Safety Human Rights Juan Echavarria Just Cause Termination Limitation Period Long-Term Disability Benefits LTD Benefits LTD Insurance Benefits Mechanical Business News Resignation Sale of Business Severance Pay Stock Options termination notice Total Disability wrongful dismissal

Footer

Contact Us

181 University Avenue, Suite 2200 Toronto, Ontario Canada M5H 3M7

T 416-642-0460
F 416-363-7875

Contact Page LinkedIn
Book a Consultation






    Please note that contact through our website is for informational purpose only and does not create a lawyer-client relationship.

    * Required

    Reviews

    • I had the pleasure of working with Andrew & his team and I could not be more thankful for having them represent me during a very trying time. They were very knowledgeable and helped guide me thru the entire process. Going thru any legal issue can be very emotionally draining but knowing I had Andrew on my side def helped ease my anxiety. In the end, Andrew was able to win my dispute and I owe it all to his attention to detail and wealth of knowledge.

      Charlene De Silva

    • Robert Tarantino and his associates at Wray Legal handled my case against my former employer with compassion, ethically sound expert advice in plain language and professional courtesy during my termination process, a stressful event in any working person's life. I was presented with all potential courses of action during my initial meeting prior to making a decision to retain services, and was treated with respect and dignity every step of the way. Wray Legal was able to mediate an acceptable settlement without having to proceed with a formal human rights violation compliant at the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal. Thank you Robert, Andrew and Samantha.

      Ian G.

    • We contracted with Robert Tarantino of Wray Legal to do a respectful workplaces presentation to our organization. This was part of a follow up to a StressAssess.ca survey we had done with all of our staff. Robert’s presentation included: Introduction; Overview – Why ‘Respectful Workplaces’ is an Important Topic; What is a Respectful Workplace?; Occupational Health and Safety Act – workplace harassment; Human Rights Code – discrimination in employment; Fostering a Healthy and Respectful Workplace; and Q & A – Discussion. The presentation was extremely well done, very engaging and included excellent examples. Robert did an excellent job and I would highly recommend his services.

      Michael Roche

      CEO, Occupational Health Clinics for Ontario Workers

    • I am grateful to have worked with Andrew Wray on a Third Party Claim that was filed against me. While we arrived at a very amicable conclusion, it was a rather complex route to get there. Andrew was extremely patient with both me and the other party. His legal advice was insightful and he always acted in an extremely professional manner. I asked a lot of questions regarding law and process and Andrew always took the time to ensure that I was comfortable with both. I really had the feeling that he was actually working for me and looking out for my best interests. I would have no reservations about contacting Andrew again for help, nor would I have any reservations in recommending him to a friend or colleague. Many thanks!!

      KM

    • Andrew Wray helped me settle a dispute with my past employer which lead to a healthy settlement. I would recommend Andrew to anyone looking for a professional and cost-effective litigator.

      A Google User

    • Andrew Wray came highly recommended and now I know why! Andrew took a personal and very supportive approach as he helped to guide me through a long and challenging labour hearing process that had already cost me too many sleepless nights. His demonstrated understanding of the complex legal and procedural issues gave me a tremendous confidence. Having never previously testified or given evidence, his advice on what I could expect on the stand was worth its weight in gold. I was kepy completely in the loop with regard to strategies and next steps, and was always made to feel like I was steering the ship - with Andrew as my formidable engine. Oh, and by the way, we won the case! :)

      Jamie S.

    © 2023 Wray Legal
    Site by Cameron Duncalfe
    Privacy Policy